Native apps vs. Hybrid apps

Over recent years, the use of the mobile market has risen significantly, and the creation of native apps vs. hybrid apps is perhaps the most contentious issue for software developers today. To decide which one is the best choice for your business, it is important to explain each of them in detail and talk about the pros and cons of each type.

What are Native Apps?

When we think of mobile apps and are downloaded from the App Store or Google Play, native apps are what most of us think. The native application is a software or program which has been developed to perform some specific task on a particular environment or platform.

mobile, apps, native

The native application built using software development tools (SDK) for a certain software framework, hardware platform or operating system. What sets native apps apart from mobile web apps and hybrid apps is that they are designed for specific devices. For example, in Java, Android apps are written, and in Objective-C, iPhone apps are written. Native apps typically have better performance with rendering and animations than hybrid apps.

The advantages of Native apps

  • Native apps deliver the best performance of all three development approaches.
  • Native apps receive complete support from app stores and the overall app marketplace. Distribution in app stores helps with discoverability.
  • Native apps are interactive, intuitive, and run more smoothly in terms of user input and output.
  • Graphical applications, HD games, and intensive animation applications could work well as native applications because native code is faster than HTML and JavaScript. WebGL standards help to meet the performance of browsers and hybrid apps for gaming apps, but it still has a native edge.
  • Native SDKs allow device functionality to be accessed without addressing the complexities of native plugins and new device features.

The disadvantages of Native apps

  • Native apps use languages that are difficult to program and involve experienced developers.
  • With native apps, costs are more costly initially relative to mobile or hybrid devices.
  • For basic applications, native apps are not the best option.
  • For each platform, separate development initiative that increases development time.
  • Each application code will have its own release cycle and updates that add time and cost to the development.

What are Hybrid Apps?

Hybrid apps are hybrid apps only because they can be downloaded as a native app from the platform’s app store. It can have access to all the functionality of the native platform. Similar to the native app, it can run.

mobile, apps, Hybrid

Hybrid apps are designed using web technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, while Native apps are built for mobile platforms such as Java for Android, Swift for iOS, using specific technology and language.

The creation of hybrid apps is basically a web app with additional native functionality. If you deploy a wrapper to serve as a bridge between platforms, it is possible to include native features. A hybrid app is essentially a web app designed using HTML5 and JavaScript, bundled in a native container that loads most of the page details as the user navigates through the application (native apps usually access most of the content when the user first installs the software). Usual suspects here are your mobile banking app, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.

The advantages of Hybrid apps

  • Hybrid apps have the advantage that you can create them on a single platform, allowing you to add new features to multiple versions of your app.
  • The single code base for all platforms means writing once and running anywhere, but we need to build and maintain a separate app and code for each platform for the native application scenario.
  • The same development team can deliver web technologies for any platform, including the website.
  • Hybrid apps can accelerate performance on the same hardware-based basis as the native app.
  • Hybrid software can have the same and consistent platform-wide user experience regardless of user movements between devices or browsers.
  • The disadvantages of Hybrid apps
  • Quality is the same as native apps for most applications, but 3D, HD games, high graphics-oriented apps, and other quality-centric apps may not go well with a hybrid approach.
  • A hybrid app can access all features of the native application, such as touch, media etc. but relies on native plugins. Whole new device functionality may not be available as a native plugin at some point. We can write our own, but this adds to the creation difficulty.
  • Customizability is a major drawback of hybrid devices. The more you configure, the more you direct to a native solution. If customization is essential to you, it will be more beneficial to take the native approach to development. In reality, the more flexibility you want in your hybrid app, the more costly the project will be, resulting in a more cost-effective native solution.

Which one to choose?

The decision to build a web, native or hybrid app should be based on the goals of your business. For both hybrid and native strategies, there are clear and distinct advantages and disadvantages, and that is why this debate is still important. Business speed, one source code, cross-compatible web technologies, quick upgrades, resource availability, and lower budget costs make hybrid applications attractive.

mobile, apps, web

 Before jumping into development, the following factors should be considered:

  • How quickly do you need the app?
  • The consistency of the user experience that you want your app to have
  • The variety of functionality that your app requires to work with

Marketing speed, one source code, cross-compatible web technologies, quick upgrades, availability of resources and lower budget costs make hybrid applications very attractive. But in the long run, the biggest drawback to hybrid apps is that a company is likely to spend more time updating and modifying the device due to user complaints about Interface functionality or performance-driven issues.

In addition, native apps have the added advantage of functionality that is unique to the OS on which the device is designed (e.g., camera, GPS, address book, etc.). In addition, a native approach offers the best in mobile application class security, the best performance, a highly responsive user interface, and access to all native APIs.

Related Posts

Leave a comment